Semantics of Perspectival Utterances
نویسنده
چکیده
Perspectival utterances are analyzed within Situation Semantics framework. Perspectival expressions are expressions speakers use when they describe facts from certain standpoints within their environments. Uses of perspecti-val expressions have two significant characteristics , bi-directional contextual dependency, and perspectivity transfer. Relational conception of meaning and mental states central in situation semantics is shown to be particularly useful in explicating perspectivity phenomena. A model is then presented which (1) attributes perspec-tivity to agents' mental states, (2) introduces the notion of point of view parameter in mental states, and (3) incorporates a general picture of linguistic communication. The model is shown to capture correctly our intuitions behind the uses of perspectival expressions. 1 Introduction Suppose that I am standing face to face to you and showing you a picture of me taken with several other people, and utter a sentence "Mr. Tanaka is standing left of me." There are three possibilities for what information I could intend the utterance to convey. Namely, the information that Mr. Tanaka is standing left of me, viewed from my position, from where I am now speaking, or the information that Mr. Tanaka is standing left of me, viewed from your position, from where you are now listening to my talk, or the information that Mr. Tanaka is standing left of me, viewed from my location in the picture. I may describe the location of Mr. Tanaka from either of these three perspectives. Or consider a case where a girl Hanako, after having read a story about a boy Taro, uttered in describing the plot of the story to her friend, "Taro had his belly, button stolen by Mr. Thunder." She was empathizing with the story protagonist Taro, and was describing the incident from his perspective. These examples show that, there are a certain class of expressions, the utterances of which not only describe external objective facts but also convey to hearers pieces of information about speakers, namely, from whose perspectives or points of view speakers are describing external facts. 1 These expressions are called perspectival expressions. Uses of perspectival expressions have following two significant characteristics. (1) Bi-directional contextual dependency: Information on point of view can either be supplied from context of utterances, or be specified explicitly by the form of utterances and added to ongoing context. (2) Perspectivity transfer: Perspectivity usually transfer from speakers to hearers in normal linguistic communications and hearers typically end up in states …
منابع مشابه
Some Solutions to the Perspectival Plurality Problem for Relativism
(1) Johnny played a silly prank and had a lot of tasty licorice. phenomenon of perspectival plurality has been shown to pose a serious problem for at least some versions of relativism about predicates of taste (the view that postulates a parameter for perspectives in the circumstances of evaluation with respect to which utterances of sentences are evaluated). Perspectival plurality is the pheno...
متن کاملMultifunctionality and multidimensional dialogue semantics
This paper addresses the following questions: (1) Is it true, as is often claimed, that utterances in dialogue tend to have multiple functions? (2) If so, then what are the reasons for that? (3) How many functions does a dialogue utterance typically have, and which factors determine this? (4) What consequences does this have for the computational semantics of dialogue utterances? Answers to the...
متن کاملIndexical Identification: A Perspectival Account
It is widely agreed that the references of indexical expressions are fixed partly by their relations to contextual parameters such as the author, time, and place of the utterance. Because of this, indexicals are sometimes described as token-reflexive or utterance-reflexive in their semantics. But when we inquire into how indexicals help us to identify items within experience, we find that while...
متن کاملDeeply Engaged and Strongly Perspectival? The Impasse in the Psychology-Christianity Dialogue and Its Missional Resolution
Christians in psychology tend to do two types of scholarship: (1) deeply engaged, weakly perspectival research, in which the work is done for mainstream audiences but Christian beliefs remain largely implicit, and/or (2) strongly perspectival, relatively disengaged research, in which Christian beliefs are made explicit but the work is done for a nonmainstream, typically Christian, audience. Tho...
متن کاملClarifying Utterances
The paper argues for the importance of utterances (as opposed to \sen-tences in context") as basic units in dialogue. The main case study is clar-iication: a characterization is provided within KOS, a recently developed synthesis of situation semantics and dialogue games, of the clariications that can follow up on an utterance. This involves outlining: (a) a theory of understanding for dialogue...
متن کامل